Message to one diktator re another

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Edmund Standing: Norway: Exploiting Dead People

Since the atrocious attacks carried out Anders Breivik, a position seems to be emerging in various left-wing quarters that basically claims that because Breivik held extreme forms of some broadly speaking conservative positions, any kind of conservative position is now intrinsically invalid and irredeemably tainted, and can be held to be somehow ‘linked’ to terrorism.
This kind of argument essentially constitutes yet another logical fallacy – the ‘argument from terrorism’ it might be called. It goes something like this: Breivik was obsessed with Muslims, believed in a Marxist conspiracy, and was radically opposed to immigration, consequently anyone who opposes Islamist groups, left-wing intellectual positions, or unfettered immigration is intrinsically tied to Breivik and to terrorism. It’s an easy way to dispose of conservative thinking in one fell swoop, but it’s also logically incoherent and grossly exploitative of a terrorist outrage. Essentially, this argument uses dead children to score political points, which is pretty sick.
I, for example, argue that leftist hegemony in post-war Western intellectual life has been a bad thing. The fact that Breivik believed that there is some kind of Marxist conspiracy in the West doesn’t invalidate my position.
Read the rest here. 

And don't forget: Bill Ayers, a convicted US terrorist, who was responsible for the murder of a policeman in the 1960's, is now an academic, a friend and advisor to the President of the United States, and the ghost writer of Obama's book, Dreams From My Father. He is a Marxist academic and anti-semite, together with his co-terrorist wife and academic, Bernadine Dohrn.

No comments:

Post a Comment