More evidence that mozlems suffer from a genetic mental disorder:
Who won the Arab-Israeli war?
Israel won the Arab-Israeli War in 1973 and took Sinai as a buffer-zone against the savages!
 |
| Captured Egyptian soldiers at the 'Orha' array. |
 |
| Israeli soldiers pose next to a destroyed Egyptian helicopter, in Africa |
More great photos here: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?68771-Yum-Kippur-War/page54
President Mohamed Morsi has granted former president Anwar Sadat and his
chief of staff Saad El-Shazli the Nile Medal of Honour, Egypt's highest
award, for their conduct during the 1973 War with Israel.
The medals were presented to relatives of the two men at the presidential palace in Heliopolis on Wednesday.
Sadat was also granted an additional medal of honour for his role during the war.
President Morsi is set to attend a military parade on Saturday to celebrate the 39th anniversary of the 1973 War, commonly known as the 6 October War or the Yom Kippur War.
 |
| Shazly far right, Mubarak in the middle |
The rest here.
Poor Saad!! Still in denial after all these years! Or is it de Nile?? Heh!!
Both men are dead.
"This brilliant military victory, was turned
into a political defeat, when Egypt was removed from the camp of
resistance, to Israeli occupation of Arab lands to the camp of
appeasement." Saad el Shazly.
And from
Yosef Hartuv
Sometimes you just
scratch your head and wonder, other times ... even that will not
adequately convey one's amazement. This excerpt from the Egypt Independent yesterday certainly meets the criteria:
“...We had a lot of superiority factors at the beginning. We succeeded
in implementing the elements of surprise and initiative –– it was
military planning at its highest levels,” recalls Bilal Barakat, a
retired general who headed an artillery unit during the war. “After six
years of intense and realistic training, the troops were able to perform
the crossing almost on auto mode.”
Starting on 13 October, however, Barakat says the situation was reversed.
Beyond the canal crossing
What happened after that can’t be found in most records of the war in
Egypt, whether in school curriculums, media or political speeches.
Historian Assem al-Dessouky argues that Sadat wanted to convince the
Egyptian people that the war ended with the crossing of the canal to
cover up his strategic mistakes later in the war.
With Sadat hailed as the mastermind of the October victory and toppled
President Hosni Mubarak celebrated as the leader of the initial
airstrike, both presidents had vested interests in propagating the war
as an unquestionable victory, and prohibiting any questioning of the
events during their rule.
Saad Eddin al-Shazly, military chief of staff at the time of the war,
was dismissed in December 1973 after clashing with Sadat and Defense
Minister Ahmed Ismail over several strategic decisions during the course
of the war. He was marginalized by the regime.
Only after Mubarak’s ouster in 2011 were Shazly’s memoirs, “October War,” published in Egypt –– revealing a very different view.
“History will attest that ... Egyptian officers and soldiers have all
exerted their best effort and had the greatest performance, but that
Egypt’s ruler at the time, hungry for power and for the spotlight, has
aborted their victory,” Shazly writes.
Following Egypt’s initial success, Shazly recounts that Sadat and Ismail
insisted against field commanders’ advice on expanding the attack
further into Sinai. Following the failure of the attack, Sadat committed
what Shazly calls his second strategic mistake, bringing in
reinforcements from reserve troops in the west, leaving the forces at
the canal with little backup.
While Egyptian forces were suffering heavy losses in the east, Israeli
troops were able to cross to the west of the canal through a gap between
the Egyptian second and third armies.
Following the elation of the crossing, Barakat remembers the Israeli advancement into the west of the canal as “painful.”
As the roles were reversed and Egyptian losses started to exceed
Israel’s, Sadat still refused to end his attempted attack on the east
and return the reserves to the west to fend off the attacks, Shazly
writes.
By the time a United Nations ceasefire was imposed, the Israeli forces
had advanced 35 kilometers into the west of the canal, completely
surrounding the third army and cutting it off from its leadership. In
the absence of organized troops, an attempted attack on Suez city on 24
October was fended off mainly by civilian fighters.
“They were less than one hour away from Cairo,” says Barakat, adding
that, based on the deteriorating state of the forces on the ground,
accepting the ceasefire and resorting to a diplomatic resolution was
inevitable.
Shazly says with the third army under siege and getting supplies only
from Israelis, Egypt was forced to abide by Israel’s conditions in the
ceasefire treaty.
Meanwhile, Egyptians celebrated the announced victory. “While these
humiliating procedures were occurring on the political and the military
levels, the Egyptian people were the last to know, like a deceived
husband,” writes Shazly.
“I consider it an incomplete victory. It would have had a true sweet taste if it weren't for the Israeli penetration,”
says Barakat. Lockman says that, hungry for a source of pride following
the humiliating 1967 defeat, Egyptians were not too skeptical of the
victory announcement. (Emphasis added. Y)
While many may not understand the reference, what came to mind was Monty
Python's famous Black Knight, filmed in 1975 and perhaps reflecting
such a world view although better left to comedy:
Video of the Black Knight scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjEcj8KpuJw
http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/less-than-one-hour-away-from-cairo-and.html
