The Egyptians Rewrite History: Despite Losing 1973 War against Israel, They Won!!

 More evidence that mozlems suffer from a genetic mental disorder:

 Who won the Arab-Israeli war?

Israel won the Arab-Israeli War in 1973 and took Sinai as a buffer-zone against the savages!

 

Captured Egyptian soldiers at the 'Orha' array.

Israeli soldiers pose next to a destroyed Egyptian helicopter, in Africa

More great photos here: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?68771-Yum-Kippur-War/page54

President Mohamed Morsi has granted former president Anwar Sadat and his chief of staff Saad El-Shazli the Nile Medal of Honour, Egypt's highest award, for their conduct during the 1973 War with Israel.
The medals were presented to relatives of the two men at the presidential palace in Heliopolis on Wednesday.
Sadat was also granted an additional medal of honour for his role during the war.
President Morsi is set to attend a military parade on Saturday to celebrate the 39^th anniversary of the 1973 War, commonly known as the 6 October War or the Yom Kippur War.

Shazly far right, Mubarak in the middle

The rest here.

Poor Saad!! Still in denial after all these years! Or is it de Nile?? Heh!! 
Both men are dead.

"This brilliant military victory, was turned into a political defeat, when Egypt was removed from the camp of resistance, to Israeli occupation of Arab lands to the camp of appeasement." Saad  el Shazly.

And from Yosef Hartuv

Sometimes you just scratch your head and wonder, other times ... even that will not adequately convey one's amazement. This excerpt from the Egypt Independent yesterday certainly meets the criteria:

“...We had a lot of superiority factors at the beginning. We succeeded in implementing the elements of surprise and initiative –– it was military planning at its highest levels,” recalls Bilal Barakat, a retired general who headed an artillery unit during the war. “After six years of intense and realistic training, the troops were able to perform the crossing almost on auto mode.”

Starting on 13 October, however, Barakat says the situation was reversed.

Beyond the canal crossing

What happened after that can’t be found in most records of the war in Egypt, whether in school curriculums, media or political speeches.

Historian Assem al-Dessouky argues that Sadat wanted to convince the Egyptian people that the war ended with the crossing of the canal to cover up his strategic mistakes later in the war.

With Sadat hailed as the mastermind of the October victory and toppled President Hosni Mubarak celebrated as the leader of the initial airstrike, both presidents had vested interests in propagating the war as an unquestionable victory, and prohibiting any questioning of the events during their rule.

Saad Eddin al-Shazly, military chief of staff at the time of the war, was dismissed in December 1973 after clashing with Sadat and Defense Minister Ahmed Ismail over several strategic decisions during the course of the war. He was marginalized by the regime.

Only after Mubarak’s ouster in 2011 were Shazly’s memoirs, “October War,” published in Egypt –– revealing a very different view.

“History will attest that ... Egyptian officers and soldiers have all exerted their best effort and had the greatest performance, but that Egypt’s ruler at the time, hungry for power and for the spotlight, has aborted their victory,” Shazly writes.

Following Egypt’s initial success, Shazly recounts that Sadat and Ismail insisted against field commanders’ advice on expanding the attack further into Sinai. Following the failure of the attack, Sadat committed what Shazly calls his second strategic mistake, bringing in reinforcements from reserve troops in the west, leaving the forces at the canal with little backup.

While Egyptian forces were suffering heavy losses in the east, Israeli troops were able to cross to the west of the canal through a gap between the Egyptian second and third armies.

Following the elation of the crossing, Barakat remembers the Israeli advancement into the west of the canal as “painful.”


As the roles were reversed and Egyptian losses started to exceed Israel’s, Sadat still refused to end his attempted attack on the east and return the reserves to the west to fend off the attacks, Shazly writes.

By the time a United Nations ceasefire was imposed, the Israeli forces had advanced 35 kilometers into the west of the canal, completely surrounding the third army and cutting it off from its leadership. In the absence of organized troops, an attempted attack on Suez city on 24 October was fended off mainly by civilian fighters.

“They were less than one hour away from Cairo,” says Barakat, adding that, based on the deteriorating state of the forces on the ground, accepting the ceasefire and resorting to a diplomatic resolution was inevitable.

Shazly says with the third army under siege and getting supplies only from Israelis, Egypt was forced to abide by Israel’s conditions in the ceasefire treaty.

Meanwhile, Egyptians celebrated the announced victory. “While these humiliating procedures were occurring on the political and the military levels, the Egyptian people were the last to know, like a deceived husband,” writes Shazly.

“I consider it an incomplete victory. It would have had a true sweet taste if it weren't for the Israeli penetration,” says Barakat. Lockman says that, hungry for a source of pride following the humiliating 1967 defeat, Egyptians were not too skeptical of the victory announcement. (Emphasis added. Y)

While many may not understand the reference, what came to mind was Monty Python's famous Black Knight, filmed in 1975 and perhaps reflecting such a world view although better left to comedy:

Video of the Black Knight scene:      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjEcj8KpuJw

http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/less-than-one-hour-away-from-cairo-and.html

BBC - Scandal of the Paedophile DJs

• Former beauty queen claims she was raped in storeroom by Radio 1 DJ's 'apprentice'
• The former BBC employee was allegedly given the task of procuring girls for Jimmy Savile and other men to molest
• Ex-employee has been named separately by two different women
• Around 40 woman have now stepped forward to allege they were raped or molested by the late Sir Jimmy Savile
• Gary Glitter has already been accused of being involved in the alleged sex ring

This one will run and run. They have only just opened this can of worms. I wonder why you can't hear about it on the BBC?

A nephew of Sir Jimmy Savile yesterday told how his celebrity uncle attended ‘paedophile parties’.
Guy Marsden was just 13 when ‘Uncle Jimmy’ took him to a wealthy celebrity’s house in London in 1967 for the first of many sordid social gatherings.
Over the next 18 months, Guy and his friends went to numerous ‘parties’ where he believes men sexually abused girls and boys as young as ten. Savile was at many of these events, he said.

MORE HERE

Over eight years, writer Dan Davies was given unrivalled access to Jimmy Savile and his coterie, but no one dared to unmask the world he found... until now.

I first met Jimmy Savile at his penthouse flat in Leeds in 2004.
After buzzing on the intercom, I was told to wait in the small foyer of Lake View Court, a modern block overlooking Roundhay Park. When the wooden doors of the lift slid open, releasing a cloud of pungent cigar smoke, Jimmy emerged flanked by two large, unsmiling men. ‘Frisk him,’ he barked and I was pinned to the wall and searched for 20 rather uncomfortable seconds.
As I entered his flat he beckoned me through to his kitchen, which  was decorated with tiles of pink and brown – or ‘the colour of sex’ as he put it – before sitting down in his reclining chair to begin regaling me with tales of his poverty-stricken childhood, his friendship with the Royal Family and his curious opinions on the opposite sex. 

MORE HERE

Police are to investigate claims that Sir Jimmy Savile and an accomplice ran a sex ring at the BBC.
The Mail has been told that a BBC employee was allegedly given the task of procuring girls for the presenter and other men to molest.
The member of staff sometimes attacked them himself, it is alleged. Gary Glitter has already been accused of being a member of the sex ring. Continued here.

This is ongoing; there will be updates, WATCH THIS SPACE!

The Filthy Lying Anti-Semite Savage Kalen Ockerman

 This obscenity came all the way from Los Angeles to paint a virulently anti-semitic, libellous cartoon on a wall on east London, where many mozlems live and work, close to the East London Mosque where terrorist supporters and terror instigators regularly rant.

Was he hoping to get some cheers from the mozlems nearby? Was he hoping to get screwed by one in appreciation?

Unusually no: The mayor of Tower Hamlets, a mozlem himself ordered it removed.

Why is this Nazi piece of shit allowed to come here and stir up hate?

This is the classic Nazi and anti-semitic blood libel, that Jews are only interested in money, are running the world and make a living from killing people.

It is just a repeat of ancient blood-libels perpetrated by the Russians, who created the bunch of lies and filth called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Mein Kampf, Hitler's manual of hate and evil.

The fact that this creature has come from Los Angeles to do this, illustrates how far America has fallen under the Obama anti-Israel anti-semitic fascist regime.

Ockerman is a perverted lying Goebbels propagandist.

HOWEVER.... I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH HER COMMENT AT THE END THAT THE TWO FACES OF ANGER ARE EQUAL: ON THE CONTRARY, THE LEFT HAND FACE REPRESENTS ANGER AT THE BARBARISM OF THE TERRORIST ON THE RIGHT. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ANGRY AND TO DEMONSTRATE IT!!

From Lucy Lips at Harry's Place:

For the past few weeks, I’ve been receiving email after email alerting me to a mural in Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane. It is the work of an artist called Kalen Ockerman, also known as “Mear One”.

One email, from a celebrated artist, expressed the view that it appeared to have been produced by a “spray can wielding time traveller from 30’s Berlin”. The others commented on what they perceived to be its antisemitic message. In short, they took the bearded and big nosed financiers in the middle of the mural to be Jews.

I’ve seen the mural, in person. It is clearly a conspiracist work. In particular, the use of the pyramid motif from the dollar bill is a favourite theme of those who are fixated on freemasons and illuminati. But were the men with beards supposed to be Jews? Well, possibly – but I’ve seen more obvious stereotypes of Jews deployed in antisemitic art.
This is what Mick Hartley had to say:

Do the members of that evil cabal have big hooked noses, by any chance?
Hmm….we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on that one. Just.

That was my view too.
Well, I was wrong. The JC reports:

Mr Ockerman is based in Los Angeles and completed the Tower Hamlets mural last month. On his Facebook page he admitted the mural was intended to depict Jewish bankers.
He wrote: “A group of conservatives do not like my mural and are playing a race card with me. My mural is about class and privilege. The banker group is made up of Jewish and white Anglos. For some reason they are saying I am antisemitic. This I am most definitely not… What I am against is class.”
Mr Ockerman asked supporters to “rally” at the mural and stop any attempts to remove it.

The illustration is actually a very clear exposition of Ockerman’s worldview. There’s a huge masonic world conspiracy, involving financiers and capitalists, who are thematically (but not exclusively) rich Jews.
His objection to being thought an antisemite is also worth examining. What Ockerman is essentially saying is “you don’t understand my conspiracy theory properly”. His point is that his conspiracy theory include Jews: but only as a component of the capitalist-illuminati-masonic conspiracy. And even then, not all Jews. Just rich Jews: the embodiment of Capitalism.

Ockerman really does not think that this is a racist perspective. He either doesn’t recognise the very ancient history of the rendering of Jews as the epitome of Capitalist exploiters (not to mention the Communist enslavers). Or he thinks that this is just, well, true.  Moreover, he thinks that he’s essentially engaged in a “class” rather than a “racial” struggle.
The equation of Jews with Capitalism is, once again, commonplace with people who think of themselves as Left wing.
Lutfur Rahman, the Islamic Forum Europe backed Mayor of Tower Hamlets, has called for the mural to be removed:

The mural is painted on the end wall of a private property, but Tower Hamlets Council said it was liaising with police to have the image removed.
Lutfur Rahman, the Tower Hamlets mayor, said: “I have received a number of complaints that the mural has antisemitic images. I share these concerns. Whether intentional or otherwise, the images of the bankers perpetuate antisemitic propaganda about conspiratorial Jewish domination of financial and political institutions.
“Where freedom of expression runs the risk of inciting racial hatred then it is right that such expression should be curtailed. I have asked my officers to do everything possible to see to it that this mural is removed.”

In one sense – good for him. There’s an irony though: in that the depiction of Jews in traditionally antisemitic terms is also stock in trade of his closest political allies.
Nevertheless, I’d oppose the whitewashing of the mural. It will be gone in due course – the wall is a shifting canvas for a range of artists, including the very impressive piece which preceded it, whose political message struck a chord with me.

But what a foul man Mr Ockerman is.

University atheist society ordered out of freshers’ fair for displaying ‘blasphemous’ pineapple called Mohammed

•  Mozlem trainee doctors on one of the university's medical courses began walking out of lectures on evolution claiming it conflicts with creationist ideas established in the Koran.

  So much for Academe and its respect for the truth!!

  Reading union staff claimed fruit caused ‘distress and upset’ to other students

• University accused of ‘pandering to the hurt feelings of the 'devout’ - the devoutly full of hate and antisemitism!!

  Offending fruit: An atheist society at Reading University were ejected from the freshers’ fair after displaying a pineapple labelled with the name of the Prophet Mohammed
  A group of atheist students were thrown out of their freshers’ fair because they included a pineapple labelled ‘Mohammed’ on their stall.
  
  The Reading University Atheist, Humanist and Secularist Society (RAHS) said they wanted to celebrate free speech and promote their upcoming debate ‘Should we respect religion?’
  
  But they were ordered to remove the offending fruit by union staff who said their actions were causing ‘upset and distress’ to a number of Muslim students and other societies.
  
  RAHS refused, citing that they had labelled the pineapple after the Islamic prophet to ‘encourage discussion about blasphemy, religion, and liberty’.
  
  A spokesman said: ‘We wanted to celebrate the fact that we live in a country in which free speech is protected and where it is lawful to call a pineapple by whatever name one chooses.’
  
  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212992/University-atheist-society-ordered-freshers-fair-displaying-blasphemous-pineapple-called-Mohammed.html#ixzz28Qo556jE